Judge overseeing DOJ Epstein grand jury records request asks for more information

Judge overseeing DOJ Epstein grand jury records request asks for more information

The federal judge now overseeing the Justice Department's request to unseal grand jury records from Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell's criminal case said in a new order Tuesday that he plans to rule "expeditiously" on the matter but requires more information before he can. "The Court intends to resolve this motion expeditiously," District Judge Paul Engelmayer said in afour-page order, filed Tuesday. "However, the Court cannot rule on the motion without additional submissions," the order also said. Engelmayer is asking for further briefing from the Justice Department after he said their initial motion "does not adequately address" what the filing said is a "non-exhaustive list of factors for district courts to weigh in considering applications for disclosure" of such secret grand jury information. MORE: Why unsealing Epstein grand jury records could be a long process Engelmayer gave the government until July 29 to submit a brief further outlining their justification for seeking the release of the records, which he said should address whether they have already reviewed grand jury transcripts from Maxwell's case and whether they provided notice to victims prior to their motion to unseal the records. The order also directs the government to file under seal an index of Maxwell grand jury transcript materials, the transcripts themselves and a proposed redacted set of the transcripts, as well as other items. Lawyers for Maxwell on Tuesday asked the judge to let them review any grand jury testimony before they take a position on whether to release it to the public. According to the letter from Maxwell's lawyers, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche does not oppose allowing them to review the grand jury transcripts. "As counsel for Ms. Maxwell, we would similarly like to review the grand jury transcripts at issue (we have not seen them and our understanding is that they have never been provided to the defense in their entirety) in order to craft a response and set out our position to the Court," her lawyer David Oscar Markus wrote. The unusual legal predicament comes as lawyers for the Department of Justice are attempting to unseal sensitive grand jury transcripts related to Epstein and meet with Maxwell. An objection from Maxwell into unsealing the records could further complicate the process of potentially releasing the records. Separately, Engelmayer set a deadline of Aug. 5 for the victims in the case to address their positions regarding the disclosure of the grand jury transcripts. President Donald Trumpannounced last weekthat he'd ordered Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek the release of additional Epstein material following pushback from conservatives and others for more transparency in the case. Bondisaid Mondaythat Deputy Attorney Todd Blanche will meet with Ghislaine Maxwell sometime in the "coming days." "President Trump has told us to release all credible evidence. If Ghislane Maxwell has information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims, the FBI and the DOJ will hear what she has to say," Blanche said in astatementposted by Bondi on X. Democrats were critical of any arrangement with Maxwell. "DAG Blanche is now doing an end-run around the SDNY and its institutional policies by acting as a political agent of President Trump to forestall the release of the full Epstein files by tacitly floating a pardon for Maxwell in return for information that politically benefits President Trump," Rep. Dan Goldman, D-N.Y., said.

byKonstantin Pynzar

in

July 22, 2025

Judge overseeing DOJ Epstein grand jury records request asks for more information

Judge overseeing DOJ Epstein grand jury records request asks for more information The federal judge now overseeing the Justice Department...

Read More

Senate considering nomination of ex-Trump defense lawyer for lifetime appointment to appeals court

Senate considering nomination of ex-Trump defense lawyer for lifetime appointment to appeals court

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate narrowly voted on Tuesday to begin considering the nomination of formerTrumplawyerEmil Bovefor a lifetime appointment as a federal appeals court judge, with at least one Republican opposed and Democrats vowing to try to slow his confirmation. Bove, a former criminal defense lawyer for President Donald Trump, is now a top official at the Justice Department. His nomination for the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has come under intense scrutiny from Democrats after a fired department lawyer said he suggested the Trump administrationmay need to ignore judicial commands— a claim Bovedenies. He was at the forefront of the department's dismissed corruption case against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. He has alsoaccused FBI officials of "insubordination"for refusing to hand over the names of agents who investigated the 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol andordered the firingsof a group of prosecutors involved in those Jan. 6 criminal cases. The 50-48 vote came after Democrats forced an additional procedural vote on his nomination, an effort to protest the nomination and delay the process. Senate Democratic LeaderChuck Schumercalled Bove "the extreme of the extreme of the extreme" and "Trump's worst judicial nominee to date." "Mr. Bove's entire career has been built on one thing: fealty to Donald Trump," Schumer said. Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski was the only Republican to vote with Democrats against moving to consider the nomination. Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, voted with Republicans to move forward but said in a statement that she will oppose Bove's confirmation on a final vote. "We have to have judges who will adhere to the rule of law and the Constitution and do so regardless of what their personal views may be," Collins said. "Mr. Bove's political profile and some of the actions he has taken in his leadership roles at the Department of Justice cause me to conclude he would not serve as an impartial jurist." It is unclear whether any other Republicans will oppose Bove's confirmation. If all Democrats vote against the nomination, Senate Republicans can lose three GOP votes and still confirm him if Vice President JD Vance breaks a 50-50 tie. The tension and delays over Bove's nomination come as Republicans have tried to move Trump's nominees as quickly as possible and as Trump has pushed Senate Majority Leader John Thune to skip the traditional August recess to stay in session and confirm more judges and executive branch officials. Thune said he is considering doing that if Democrats continue to force delays, and Democrats have shown little signs of letting up. At his confirmation hearing earlier this month, Bove took criticism of his tenure head-on, telling lawmakers he understands some of his decisions "have generated controversy." But Bove said he has been inaccurately portrayed as Trump's "henchman" and "enforcer" at the department. "I am someone who tries to stand up for what I believe is right," Bove said. Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin, the top Democrat on the panel, said Bove has used his position "to weaponize the Department of Justice against the president's enemies." Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, defended Bove against the whistleblower's claims and said he deserves fair treatment. He said Democrats withheld the complaint from the fired lawyer and that his staff had investigated the claims. "Mr. Bove has a strong legal background and has served his country honorably," Grassley said at a Senate Judiciary meeting last week, where Democrats walked out in protest. The whistleblower complaint came from a former Justice Department lawyer who was fired in April after conceding in court thatKilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran man who had been living in Maryland, was mistakenly deported to an El Salvador prison. That lawyer, Erez Reuveni, described efforts by top Justice Department officials in the weeks before his firing to stonewall and mislead judges to carry out deportations championed by the White House. Reuveni described a Justice Department meeting in March concerning Trump's plans to invokethe Alien Enemies Actover what the president claimed was an invasion by the Venezuelan gangTren de Aragua. Reuveni said Bove raised the possibility that a court might block the deportations before they could happen. Reuveni claims Bove used a profanity in saying the department would need to consider telling the courts what to do and "ignore any such order," Reuveni's lawyers said in the filing. Bove said he has "no recollection of saying anything of that kind." A former federal prosecutor in the Southern District of New York, Bove was on Trump's legal team during hisNew York hush money trialand defended Trump in the two federal criminal cases brought by the Justice Department. If confirmed by the Senate, he'll serve on the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which hears cases from Delaware, New Jersey and Pennsylvania. ___

byKonstantin Pynzar

in

July 22, 2025

Senate considering nomination of ex-Trump defense lawyer for lifetime appointment to appeals court

Senate considering nomination of ex-Trump defense lawyer for lifetime appointment to appeals court WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate narrowly vot...

Read More

Trump floats eliminating federal capital gains tax on home sales

Trump floats eliminating federal capital gains tax on home sales

President Trump on Tuesday floated the possibility of eliminating the federal capital gains tax on home sales, in a move that would change the way real estate profits are taxed for the first time in 30 years. Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office on Tuesday, Mr. Trump suggested he is weighing supportinglegislationintroduced by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia that would nix the existing capital gains tax on home sales. Greene called the tax "an outdated, unfair burden—especially in today's housing market, where values have skyrocketed." "We're thinking about that," Mr. Trump responded to a reporter, when asked how important it is that the capital gains tax be eliminated in order to "unleash" the housing market. "It would also unleash it just by lowering the interest rates," the president said, adding, "If the fed wouldlower the rateswe wouldn't even have to do that. But we are thinking about no tax on capital gains on houses." Currently, single-tax filers can exclude up to $250,000 in capital gains from sales of their primary homes from their taxable incomes under what's called the Section 121exclusion. That amount rises to $500,000 for joint filers. Both amounts have remained fixed since 1997. Reached for comment by CBS MoneyWatch, the White House said it had nothing additional to add to Mr. Trump's comments. "Homeowners who have lived in their homes for decades, especially seniors in places where values have surged, shouldn't be forced to stay put because of an IRS penalty," Greenesaidin a statement announcing the proposed No Tax on Home Sales Act. "My bill unlocks that equity, helps fix the housing shortage, and supports long-term financial security for American families." According to Research from the National Association of Realtors (NAR), the current federal policy on the capital gains tax on home sales is "quietly distorting the housing market" by "locking in older homeowners, and strangling inventory just when America needs it most." "Stay-put penalty" A NAR study found that 34% of homeowners, or 29 million Americans, would exceed the $250,000 threshold were they to sell their homes, while 10%, or eight million Americans, would surpass the $500,000 threshold for joint filers. As a result, older homeowners are disincentivized to sell their homes, in what NAR researchers refer to as a "stay-put penalty." For example, seniors who might otherwise consider moving closer to family, or downsizing, are staying in place — and keeping housing inventory tied up. "This stagnation in housing turnover is rippling through the entire market, driving up costs and limiting opportunity — exactly the opposite of what public policy should be encouraging," Shannon McGahn, NAR executive vice president and chief advocacy officer,  said in a statement. "And it grows worse each month." Critics say eliminating the tax would only benefit wealthy Americans who can afford to pay tax on gains from home sales that exceed the limit. Joel Berner, senior economist at Realtor.com, told CBS MoneyWatch that a lot of home sellers already benefit from the $250,000 exclusion limit, and that eliminating the capital gains tax altogether would primarily benefit wealthier Americans who own residences that have appreciated by more than $250,000, or $500,000 in the case of joint filers. "It wouldn't really move the needle for a regular family, unless you have a home that's appreciated a lot," Berner told CBS MoneyWatch. "If your home has appreciated by more than $1 million, there would be a benefit to removing the capital gains tax." Inventory release He also suspects abolishing the capital gains tax on home sales would release inventory onto the housing market. "It could be a good thing for the market. In particular where inventory is constrained, it could benefit regular folks," Berner said. By contrast, eliminating the federal tax would also erase revenue paid to the government, and could spark increased interest frominvestors and speculators, which could also drive up home values. That would contribute to the nation's housing affordability problem, according to Berner. Nearly 27% of all homes sold in the first three months of the year were bought by investors — the highest share in at least five years, according to a report by real estate data provider BatchData. Video shows conditions inside New York City immigrant detention facility U.S. Olympic Committee effectively bars transgender women from competing in Olympic women's sports Columbia University expels some protesters as school tries to work with Trump administration

byKonstantin Pynzar

in

July 22, 2025

Trump floats eliminating federal capital gains tax on home sales

Trump floats eliminating federal capital gains tax on home sales President Trump on Tuesday floated the possibility of eliminating the feder...

Read More

MLB trade deadline: Top 26 players who could be traded between now and July 31

MLB trade deadline: Top 26 players who could be traded between now and July 31

The 2025 MLB trade deadline is nine days away, and many players could be on the move between now and 6 p.m. ET July 31. With this year's deadline shaping up to be pretty unpredictable, let's power-rank the players who seem like candidates to be traded. Here are the top 26 players who might be wearing a new jersey come Aug. 1. There might not be a hotter hitter in baseball right now than Suarez. The D-backs' third baseman seems to hit a home run almost every night and could very well be at 40 homers on the season by the time we get to next week's trade deadline.There are plenty of teams in on Suárez at this point, and given the way he's swinging the bat, he could be one of the biggest X-factors down the stretch for a contender. Of all the names listed here, Gore is probably the least likely to be moved. But after the front office and managerial changes in D.C., nothing can be ruled out with this team. That said, the Nationals keeping their talented young starter to continue building around a talented young core would not be the worst idea, either. Ryan doesn't have the name recognition of some others on this list, but he has proven to be as productive as any of them. A first-time All-Star this season, Ryan is having the best year of his career and has only gotten stronger as the season has gone on. He has a 1.80 ERA in four starts in July. Clase has been the best closer in baseball since 2021, recording the most saves in that span. Clase had one of the best seasons we've ever seen from a reliever in 2024, but in the postseason, for the first time in a long time, he didn't look dominant. Fortunately, Clase has regained his elite ability this year, with a 1.17 ERA since May 1. Will Cleveland truly be a deadline seller? The Guardians have a closer in waiting in Cade Smith and could expedite their return to AL Central relevance if they decide to move their franchise leader in saves. Paul Skenes isn't the only Pittsburgh pitcher that teams have been salivating over. Keller has put himself on the map this season, and unlike his teammate Skenes, he's a realistic candidate to be traded. After signing an extension in 2024, Keller has three years of club control after this season. Lugo has been one of the most consistent arms in the American League since he got to Kansas City in 2024, and he's the type of starter a contender could pencil into their postseason rotation. Lugo has a player option for next season, so while he's not an unrestricted free agent at the end of 2025, his future with a team acquiring him would be unclear. Given how well he has pitched since signing in K.C., Lugo choosing to go back on the free-agent market can't be ruled out. Things have not gone well in the desert this season, but the Arizona right-hander has gotten back to being one of the best in the National League. Kelly, a free agent at season's end, has plenty of postseason experience and should have his fair share of suitors as we approach the deadline. The Twins' tandem of reliever Jax and closer Duran have turned into an elite duo at the back end of the Twins' bullpen. Duran has saved at least 23 games in each of the past two seasons and is on pace to reach that mark again this year. Jax has some of baseball's best swing-and-miss stuff, with a K/9 over 14 this season. Both Duran and Jax could be weapons come October, and neither is a free agent until 2028, which is an added bonus. It once appeared that the Pirates had missed their opportunity to move their former All-Star closer, as Bednar began the 2025 season struggling and was demoted out of the closer role. But after working through his struggles, Bednar has returned to elite form. Since May 24, he has not allowed an earned run. He would be an elite addition to any contender's bullpen. You can make the case that coming into this season, only one closer in baseball was more dominant than Cardinals closer Helsley, and that would be Clase. Like Clase, Helsley didn't look like himself to begin the 2025 season, but he has started to find his form at the perfect time to give St. Louis a big trade piece at the deadline. Naylor knows how to produce runs, and his ability to be a thumper in the middle of a lineup has moved with him from Cleveland to Arizona. Naylor is on pace for a career high in hits, and though he's not known for slugging, he provides more than enough power, with a 126 OPS+. With his contract expiring at the end of 2025, the D-backs' first baseman is an intriguing name for teams in need of a left-handed bat. One of the best starters in the National League for the past several years, Gallen is an ace when he's right. The problem is, he just hasn't been right in 2025, and for the entire first half, things looked bad for the Arizona right-hander. But in recent weeks, Gallen has started to turn the corner. He's still not his old self yet, but he might be a worthwhile gamble for the right team. In the postseason, playoff teams need a player who can do it all, and Twins utility man Castro could be the player on this year's market who fits that mold. Castro has a lot of the skills that made Tommy Edman such an intriguing addition for the Los Angeles Dodgers at last year's deadline. He has played every position on the diamond outside of catcher (yes, he has even pitched!) and is putting together his best offensive season yet. Assuming the Twins move him, Castro might go down as the most underrated player acquired at the deadline. Since he arrived in Baltimore, O'Hearn has had a resurgence and provided a spark for the Orioles. Although Baltimore as a whole has disappointed this season, O'Hearn has continued to thrive, earning his first All-Star nod. With a keen ability to get on base and low strikeout numbers, O'Hearn has a unique skill set that stands out among the bats on this year's trade market. No player on this list has a higher upside than Alcántara. When he's right, he's one of the best starting pitchers in the world, as seen when he won the 2022 NL Cy Young Award. But in his first full season back following Tommy John surgery in 2023, things have not gone well for Alcántara. He looked to be trending up in June, but July has been a struggle thus far, as he has a 7.94 ERA in three starts. If the Marlins don't see improvement or get the deal they want for Alcántara, his two more years of club control might lead them to wait to move him until the offseason. Alcantara isn't the only Marlins starter getting some trade attention. Right-hander Cabrera has quietly had a strong season in South Beach and has actually been more productive than his teammate Alcántara. Cabrera is the type of high-upside arm who could be a monster down the stretch in the right team's hands. Maton is going to make a contender very happy at this year's deadline. The Cardinals' right-hander is having the best season of his career, with a 2.48 ERA, and he brings with him plenty of postseason experience. The Orioles are expected to move only players on expiring deals, and that means left-hander Soto could be one of their most valuable assets at this year's deadline. He has plenty of high-leverage experience, and with the Boston Red Sox headed toward being buyers, Aroldis Chapman probably won't be available. For teams looking for a power arm from the left side, Soto might be their man. Considering that we have a market desperate for starting pitchers, the White Sox might've struck gold when they took a flier on right-hander Houser heading into 2025. Houser has been fantastic in his stint in Chicago, putting himself on the radar of teams in need of starting pitching. For a team such as the White Sox that has to find developmental wins as they rebuild, Houser is a huge developmental win. Santana, like Bednar, has been able to stand out in Pittsburgh and has shown himself to be capable of getting plenty of swing-and-miss. The Pirates' right-hander has one of the best sliders in the game, ranking 10th in MLB in run value with the pitch. Santana is the type of arm that could bolster a bullpen in a big way. Iglesias has been closing games for a long time, and in his 11th season in the big leagues, he's still getting it done. The Braves' closer was unhittable last season, with a sub-2.00 ERA, and while things have not quite been as automatic this season, Iglesias still has the ability to close or be part of a high-leverage duo or trio for a team that already has a dominant closer. A free agent at season's end, Iglesias should have his fair share of suitors. Ozuna has been a force since his arrival in Atlanta, and he's capable of carrying a lineup for weeks at a time. Injuries have seen the Braves' slugger take a step back in 2025, but right-handed power is a valuable asset, and Ozuna would bring plenty of it to a needy contender. The White Sox's star was in hibernation for the entire first half, looking like a shell of the All-Star he was in 2023. But since the break, Robert has shown flashes of the special talent he has shown he can be when healthy. Chicago's center fielder is an intriguing name, as he has the most talent among the center fielders available and comes with two club options after this season. Will he deliver enough production down the stretch to make that worth it for a contender? Since his arrival in the big leagues, Hayes has never lived up to his top-prospect hype. But one thing the Pirates' third baseman has delivered is elite defense at third base. If not for Nolan Arenado, we might be talking about Hayes as a multi-time Gold Glove Award winner at the hot corner. Meanwhile, his bat is fine hitting at the bottom of a playoff-caliber lineup, where he's not expected to be a run producer. Many believed Cedric Mullins would be the Orioles outfielder moved at the deadline, but Laureano has been getting the attention — and for good reason. He's one of the best hitters in baseball against right-handed pitching, currently ninth in MLB in OPS vs. righties. Laureano could be a strong right-handed corner outfielder for a contender, and his being a reverse-splits guy makes him even more intriguing.

byKonstantin Pynzar

in

July 22, 2025

MLB trade deadline: Top 26 players who could be traded between now and July 31

MLB trade deadline: Top 26 players who could be traded between now and July 31 The 2025 MLB trade deadline is nine days away, and many playe...

Read More

House attorneys, power conferences work out deal to relax NIL collective roadblocks: Sources

House attorneys, power conferences work out deal to relax NIL collective roadblocks: Sources

LAS VEGAS — Less than a month into the implementation of the House settlement, college sports' new enforcement entity is adjusting its approach. Attorneys for the House plaintiffs have struck an agreement with the power conferences and NCAA officials to amend the decision-making from the industry's new enforcement arm, the College Sports Commission, related to how booster-backed collectives can compensate athletes. Multiple sources spoke to Yahoo Sports under condition of anonymity. As part of the agreement, the College Sports Commission is expected to treat collectives or any "school-associated entity" in a similar fashion as other businesses when determining the legitimacy of third-party NIL deals submitted to the CSC's NIL Go clearinghouse. This is a change from the CSC's previously publicized approach. According to a memo sent to schools two weeks ago, the CSC — created and administered by the power conferences — explained that it has denied dozens of athlete deals from collectives because it is holding collectives to a higher threshold, announcing that businesses whose sole existence is to pay athletes (i.e. collectives) cannot meet the definition of a "valid business purpose." House plaintiff attorneys Jeffrey Kessler and Steve Berman took issue with that interpretation, sending to the NCAA and power league officials a letter demanding the guidance be retracted and suggesting thoserejected deals be reinstated. Kessler, in his letter, threatened to take the issue to the magistrate judge, Nathanael Cousins, who is presiding over House settlement disputes. Some of the NIL deals that the CSC rejected while applying the previous guidance will be re-evaluated based on the new approach. [Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Football league for the 2025 NFL season] A spokesperson for the power conferences and the CSC said conversations with class counsel "remain ongoing." A formal statement will be issued when the issue has been resolved. The interpretation of the "valid business purpose" rule is not insignificant. It is one of two measurementsused by the new CSC's NIL Go clearinghouseto determine the legitimacy of third-party deals. The second is a Deloitte-created "compensation range" standard that deals must fall within. The change to the valid business purpose standard potentially opens the door for the continuation of school-affiliated, booster-backed collectives to provide athletes with compensation that, if approved by the clearinghouse, does not count against a school's House settlement revenue-share cap. This provides collectives a path to strike deals with athletes as long as those transactions deliver to the public goods and services for a profit for the organization, such as holding athlete merchandise sales, autograph signings and athlete appearances at, for example, golf tournaments. The resolution creates what administrators term more of a "soft cap" as opposed to a hard cap, as SEC commissionerGreg Sankey described it last week in an interview with Yahoo Sports. The expectation is that collectives will create legal ways to provide additional compensation, as Big Ten commissioner Tony Petitti described Monday in an interview with Yahoo Sports from Big Ten media days. "When something works, it gets copied," he said. "Things happening out there to provide additional NIL deals for student athletes that make sense and are allowed under rules, you're going to see more versions of that." The change also, at least for now, prevents a legal challenge from leaders of a group of NIL collectives who began drafting a lawsuit against the CSC's approach. Over the last four years, collectives have served as the driving force for schools to compensate athletes, raising millions in booster money to provide schools a way to recruit and retain players. However, the CSC's original interpretation of the "valid business purpose" definition, and resulting denials of collective deals, speaks to one of administrators' goals of the settlement — to shift athlete pay from these booster-run organizations to the schools, which are now permitted to directly share revenue with athletes under the capped system that began July 1. That said, many schools are still operating their collectives as a way to, perhaps, circumvent the system. For example, schools continue to operate their collectives — some out of fear that others are doing the same and some believing that the settlement will fail under the weight of legal challenges. "We know that some people are saying, 'We're not worried because we don't think they can really enforce it.'" Ole Miss coach Lane Kiffin told Yahoo Sports last week from SEC media days. "They don't think NIL contracts are going to get kicked back [by the clearinghouse] or they think they're not going to be able to win long-term [legal challenges] because of players rights." Ultimately, Sankey suggested, schools hold authority to control their own affiliated collectives. "For how long have people been begging for guardrails?" Sankey asked. "Well, now we have guardrails. Those broadly across the country that claim they wanted guardrails need to operate within the guardrails. If you allow what's happened to continue to escalate, there would be a very small number of programs that would be competitive with each other and we'd not have a national sport or a national championship." The resolution may not completely end what will likely be continuous negotiations over particular enforcement rules between the power leagues controlling the CSC and the House plaintiff attorneys, who hold authority and veto powers over various aspects of the settlement. Petitti cautioned Tuesday that more such negotiations are expected in the future. "I don't think it will be the last time that an issue comes up in the process," he said. "The settlement approval came later than expected. It compressed the time period." The guidance change may also not prevent future legal challenges over other enforcement aspects, including Deloitte's compensation range concept or the appeals arbitration system that athletes can use for deals denied a second time. The CSC, in its first month of existence, is reliant on athletes submitting deals. Athletes are required to submit any third-party deal of $600 or more to an NIL clearinghouse, NIL Go. Those deals flagged by NIL Go are sent to the CSC and its new leader, Bryan Seeley, to determine an enforcement decision. As of two weeks ago, more than 100 deals were denied and at least 100 more were under review. More than 1,500 deals had been approved.

byKonstantin Pynzar

in

July 22, 2025

House attorneys, power conferences work out deal to relax NIL collective roadblocks: Sources

House attorneys, power conferences work out deal to relax NIL collective roadblocks: Sources LAS VEGAS — Less than a month into the implemen...

Read More