Despite risks, Texas Republicans launch Trump-backed effort to redraw congressional linesNew Foto - Despite risks, Texas Republicans launch Trump-backed effort to redraw congressional lines

By Joseph Ax (Reuters) -Texas Republicans on Monday launched a high-risk, high-reward redrawing of the state's 38 congressional districts, a move championed by President Donald Trump to protect the party's narrow U.S. House majority in next year's midterm elections. Trump has told reporters he expects the effort to yield as many as five additional House Republicans. Republicans hold a narrow 220-212 majority in the House, with three Democratic-held seats vacant after members' deaths. But redistricting experts said the plan could backfire if Republicans try to squeeze too many seats out of what is already considered a significantly skewed map. "Redrawing the Texas map is a dangerous proposition for House Republicans and their incumbents," Suzan DelBene, a Democratic congresswoman from Washington State and chair of the party's congressional campaign arm, told reporters. "It's basic math. For them to try to break up Democratic-held districts, they will have to weaken Republican districts, who already are facing political headwinds." Under the current lines, Republicans control 25 seats, nearly two-thirds of the districts in a state that went for Trump last year by a 56% to 42% margin. States are required to redistrict every 10 years based on the U.S. Census but the Texas map was passed just four years ago by the Republican-dominated legislature. While mid-cycle redistricting occasionally takes place, it is usually prompted by a change in power at the legislature. "This is totally unprecedented for a party to redraw its own map," said Michael Li, a redistricting expert at New York University's Brennan Center for Justice. "I can't think of another situation where the party got what it wanted, did very well and then decided to redraw its own map." Texas Democrats expressed disapproval on the state Senate floor on Monday and criticized Republicans for pursuing redistricting during a special legislative session that will also address funding for flood prevention in the wake of the deadly July 4 flash flooding that killed more than 130. But they have little recourse in a legislature dominated by Republicans. "I think this is a tremendous waste of time," Senator Roland Gutierrez, a Democrat, said. Asked about Democratic criticisms, a spokesman for Governor Greg Abbott previously said the governor was "dedicated to delivering results on issues important to Texans" during the session, including flood relief and tax cuts. PACKING AND CRACKING Gerrymandering, the process of manipulating district boundaries to benefit one party, typically includes both "packing" and "cracking." Packing involves cramming as many opposition voters into a district as possible, making it easier to win the surrounding districts; cracking divides opposition voters into multiple districts, diluting their electoral power. When lawmakers push too far, however, they run the risk of creating a so-called "dummymander," in which the margins are thin enough that the other party ends up winning districts in a voting shift. Trump's Republicans already face vulnerabilities ahead of the 2026 elections. Only 41% of Americans approve of the job he is doing, according to Reuters/Ipsos polling, and the president's party historically underperforms during midterm elections. Democrats privately concede that Republicans could fairly easily draw a new map to oust two vulnerable Democrats, Henry Cuellar and Vicente Gonzalez, whose heavily Latino south Texas districts swung toward Trump in 2024. But gaining five seats is a tougher task. "This has dummymander written all over it," said New York University's Li. "When you gerrymander, you're making a bet that you know what the future of the state will look like. In some states, that's a safe bet; in Texas, it's very much not." Texas is one of the fastest growing states in the nation, adding more than 1,500 people a day from 2023 to 2024, according to the state demographer. Texas lawmakers need only look back a few years to see how a seemingly safe gerrymander can shift. In 2018, during Trump's first term, Democrats flipped two seats and came close to winning a handful of other previously solid Republican seats, as suburban voters swung away from Trump. Following the 2020 census, Texas Republicans responded by drawing a map designed to protect their incumbents. Only three of the state's 38 districts are seen as competitive under the current lines. In calling for the special session, Abbott cited a letter from Trump's Justice Department that alleged four majority-minority districts – all held by Democrats – were unconstitutional racial gerrymanders. Democrats and civil rights groups have warned that breaking up majority-minority districts will dilute the voting power for people of color. The existing map is already the subject of several lawsuits claiming that it intentionally discriminated against minority voters. Some Democrats have also suggested fighting fire with fire by redistricting in states they control. California Governor Gavin Newsom has floated the idea of sidestepping the state's redistricting commission to draw a new, more Democrat-friendly map. (Reporting by Joseph Ax; editing by Paul Thomasch and Lincoln Feast.)

Despite risks, Texas Republicans launch Trump-backed effort to redraw congressional lines

Despite risks, Texas Republicans launch Trump-backed effort to redraw congressional lines By Joseph Ax (Reuters) -Texas Republicans on Monda...
Trump withdraws U.S. from 'woke' UNESCO program againNew Foto - Trump withdraws U.S. from 'woke' UNESCO program again

The United States again is withdrawing from the United Nations' UNESCO program, which theTrumpadministration is now labeling "woke" afterpreviously rejectingit because of alleged anti-Israel bias. The move, which goes into effect at the end of 2026, continues Trump's efforts to pull the U.S. out of international institutions he has long criticized, something he also did in his first term. White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said UNESCO "supports woke, divisive cultural and social causes that are totally out-of-step with the commonsense policies that Americans voted for in November." UNESCO Director-General Audrey Azoulay said in a statement to USA TODAY that Trump's decision to withdraw is "regrettable" and "contradicts the fundamental principles of multilateralism." Azoulay said UNESCO had been anticipating and preparing for a loss of U.S. support and "is not considering any layoffs." The U.S. currently contributes about 8% of UNESCO's budget, Azoulay said. Paris-based UNESCO was founded after World War II to promote peace through international cooperation in education, science, and culture. One of UNESCO's core missions is the World Heritage program, which protects historic and cultural sites. It also runs a number of educational programs. Trump alsowithdrew the U.S. from UNESCO- which stands for U.N. Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization - during his first administration, citing concerns about its approach to Israel. He also withdrew the U.S. from the World Health Organization, the U.N. Human Rights Council, a global climate change accord and the Iran nuclear deal. Joe Bidenreversed those decisions after taking office in 2021,returning the U.S.to UNESCO, the WHO and the climate agreement. With Trump now back in the White House, the U.S. is onceagain pulling outof these global bodies. He has already decided to withdraw the U.S. from the WHO and halt funding to the Palestinian relief agency UNRWA as part of a review of the country's participation in UN agencies, due to be concluded in August. UNESCO has been a focal point of criticism for years. The U.S. stopped funding UNESCO after it voted to include Palestine as a member in 2011. The Reagan administration withdrew from the organization in 1984, but President George W. Bush brought the United States back into the group in 2002. There are1,248 UNESCO World Heritage sitesin 170 countries, including the pyramids in Egypt, Notre-Dame Cathedral in France and the Statue of Liberty in the U.S. Contributing: Reuters;Jim Michaels This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Trump withdraws U.S. from 'woke' UNESCO program – again

Trump withdraws U.S. from 'woke' UNESCO program again

Trump withdraws U.S. from 'woke' UNESCO program again The United States again is withdrawing from the United Nations' UNESCO pro...
White House to unveil plan to push US AI abroad, crack down on restrictive rules, document showsNew Foto - White House to unveil plan to push US AI abroad, crack down on restrictive rules, document shows

By Jarrett Renshaw and Alexandra Alper WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The White House intends to publish a plan on Wednesday that calls for the export of American AI technology abroad and a crackdown on state laws deemed too restrictive to let it flourish, a document seen by Reuters shows. According to a summary of the draft plan seen by Reuters, the White House will bar federal AI funding from going to states with tough AI rules and ask the Federal Communications Commission to assess whether state laws conflict with its mandate. It will also promote open source and open weight AI development and "export American AI technologies through full-stack deployment packages" and data center initiatives led by the Commerce Department. The plan will "focus on empowering American workers through AI-enabled job creation and industry breakthroughs," according to the document. Janet Egan, a fellow at The Center for a New American Security, said the plan, as described by Reuters, represents a market shift in strategy from "a primarily restrictive approach to AI" under Biden to a focus on answering the question "how do you start spreading the infrastructure and the technology that will underpin the globe?" Despite the focus on expansion, the plan does mention the importance of "defending against misuse and preparing for future AI-related risks," according to the summary. U.S. President Donald Trump ordered his administration in January to produce a plan that would make "America the world capital in artificial intelligence" and reduce regulatory barriers to its rapid expansion. That report, which includes input from the National Security Council, is due by Wednesday. Trump is set to mark that deadline with a major speech as part of an event titled "Winning the AI Race," organized by White House AI and crypto czar David Sacks and his co-hosts on the All-In podcast. "The Plan will deliver a strong, specific, and actionable federal policy roadmap that goes beyond the details reported here and we look forward to releasing it soon," White House Office of Science and Technology Policy spokeswoman Victoria LaCivita said in a statement. Trump is laser-focused on removing barriers to AI expansion, a marked departure from his predecessor, Joe Biden, who feared U.S. adversaries like China could harness AI to supercharge its military and harm allies. Biden, who left office in January, imposed a raft of restrictions on exports of coveted American AI chips to China and other countries that could use or divert the semiconductors to China over national security concerns. Trump rescinded Biden's executive order aimed at promoting competition, protecting consumers and ensuring AI was not used for misinformation. He also pulled back Biden's so-called AI diffusion rule, which capped the amount of American AI computing capacity that some countries were allowed to obtain via U.S. AI chip imports. Last month, Sacks downplayed the risk that coveted American AI chips could be smuggled to bad actors and expressed concern that regulating U.S. AI too tightly could stifle growth and cede the critical market to China. Under Trump's plan, the White House would also promote AI use at the Pentagon, launch a program to identify federal regulations that impede AI development and streamline the permitting process for data center construction. (Reporting by Jarrett Renshaw and Alexandra Alper; Editing by Franklin Paul, Mark Porter)

White House to unveil plan to push US AI abroad, crack down on restrictive rules, document shows

White House to unveil plan to push US AI abroad, crack down on restrictive rules, document shows By Jarrett Renshaw and Alexandra Alper WASH...
An absurd quest to find who can mimic Indiana's unlikely College Football Playoff runNew Foto - An absurd quest to find who can mimic Indiana's unlikely College Football Playoff run

Before we can attempt to predict the nextIndiana, we must first appreciate the absurdity, the utter improbability, of the 2024 Hoosiers making theCollege Football Playoff. Indianawon three games the previous season and lost to some of the Big Ten's worst teams. The Hoosiers, who were in their first year with coach Curt Cignetti, had only achieved nine victories twice in its history. Never before had they won 10. Oddsmakers set their over/under at 5½ victories, and the media picked them to finish 17th in the 18-team Big Ten. The Indianapolis Star took "a pretty big leap" while predicting an 8-4 regular season for the Hoosiers. Another Big Ten newspaper of record, the Omaha World-Herald, surmised a "bowl bid is not out of the question," while projecting 6-6. Indiana's accommodating schedule aided its thrill ride, but even knowing that schedule, who foresaw the Hoosiers smashing Nebraska, handling a Michigan team that later beat Alabama, and securing playoff viability at 11-1? So, when trying to pinpoint the next Indiana, it becomes an injustice to the 2024 Hoosiers to include any preseason Top 25 team. Illinoisattracts comparisons to the 2024 Hoosiers, as basketball-leaning Big Ten schools without a history of football greatness. But, Illinois returns most of its starters from a 10-win team. Expectations are too great and too reasonable to earmark the Illini as the next Indiana. Like Illinois, Texas Tech could pursue the program's first playoff appearance, but the Red Raiders don't emulate 2024 Indiana. The Hoosiers assembled their playoff squad from the transfer portal's bargain rack. Texas Tech launched an expensive player-buying campaignfueled by billionaire booster Cody Campbell. Hardly comparable. After putting aside playoff hopefuls like Illinois and Texas Tech, what's left? Teams like UCLA,Californiaand West Virginia are ultimate longshots, built from the portal's fires. Hear me, I'm not suggesting those teams as likely playoff contenders, but, that's sort of the point, isn't it? The ultimate dark horse, Indiana stunningly crafted a warp-speed turnabout with the help of 31 transfers, a cocksure coach in Cignetti, and a favorable schedule, of which they took full advantage. UCLA, Cal and West Virginia each brought in more than 30 transfers apiece. Each has an over/under of 5½ victories. That's Indiana territory. TheBruinsmade one of the offseason's biggest acquisitions by plundering a quarterback, Nico Iamaleava, who's a former five-star recruit. He started a playoff game last season for Tennessee. UCLA, fresh off a 5-7 finish in its Big Ten debut, will endure a schedule that includes Big Ten front-runners Ohio State and Penn State, plus a non-conference tilt against Utah. Iamaleava's arrival provides hope for improvement, but it's hard to see that schedule as a recipe toward being the next Indiana. What, then, about California? TheBearsnabbed former Ohio State backup Devin Brown as a transfer quarterback. Cal, which hasn't won more than eight games since 2008, will avoid Clemson and Miami, two ACC favorites. The schedule, though, includes six road games and a matchup with SMU, a playoff qualifier from last year. That's enough to prevent Cal from becoming the next Indiana. West Virginia overhauled its roster with 52 transfers after hiring Rich Rodriguez for a homecoming. It would be more appropriate to view the Mountaineers, though, through the lens of 2024 Arizona State. The Sun Devils won the Big 12 championship after the media picked them to finish last in the conference. In the unpredictable Big 12, any number of teams could ascend and claim the auto-bid entry to the playoff. Missouri profiles as a playoff sleeper, after the media picked it to finish 12th in the SEC. The Tigers secured a fine collection of portal prizes, including former Penn State backup quarterback Beau Pribula. Missouri's accommodating schedule positions it to exceed its Vegas over/under of 7½ wins. But, the Tigers won 21 games the past two seasons. They've been too good recently to aptly compare to Indiana. POWER RANKINGS:Where the Big Ten teams stack from first to worst DEAD PLAN:SEC suffocates the Big Ten's plan to rig playoff As I search for the next Indiana, I circle back to the Big Ten. The conference is so big that teams only play half the membership, and there's no requirement to play a Power Four non-conference opponent. That's a breeding ground for a fortunate schedule draw. Consider Maryland. TheTerrapinswon't play a non-conference Power Four foe, and they avoid Ohio State, Penn State and Oregon. Expectations remain low. Vegas sets the over/under at 4½ wins. Maryland likely will start several transfers after finishing 4-8 last season, and four-star freshman Malik Washington projects as the starting quarterback. Maryland cashing in on a favorable schedule to the extent it could make the playoff sounds highly improbable. When trying to unearth an Indiana sequel, that's the assignment. If the idea doesn't sound absurd, then that team doesn't count as the next Indiana. Blake Toppmeyeris the USA TODAY Network's national college football columnist. Email him atBToppmeyer@gannett.comand follow him on X@btoppmeyer. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:College Football Playoff's next Indiana is difficult team to find

An absurd quest to find who can mimic Indiana's unlikely College Football Playoff run

An absurd quest to find who can mimic Indiana's unlikely College Football Playoff run Before we can attempt to predict the nextIndiana, ...
NFLPA controversies: What to know about Lloyd Howell, JC Tretter resignationsNew Foto - NFLPA controversies: What to know about Lloyd Howell, JC Tretter resignations

The NFLPA isn't usually the subject of significant attention unless it is negotiating a new collective bargaining agreement (CBA) with theNFL. However, in recent weeks, the labor union representing the NFL's players has found itself in the spotlight often thanks to a variety of scandals within its ranks. These controversies have caused the NFLPA's executive director, Lloyd Howell Jr., to resign just two years after taking over the role from DeMaurice Smith. JC Tretter, who served as the union's president from 2020 to 2024, is also set to step down from the organization as it undergoes a shake-up. Why is there so much turmoil within the NFLPA? Here's what to know about the recent controversies surrounding the labor union. Several controversies have rocked the NFLPA in recent weeks. Below are the full details of the two most notable ones. In January, arbiter Christopher Droney ruled on a grievance filed by former NFLPA executive director DeMaurice Smith. The grievance alleged NFL teams had colluded to limit guaranteed money in deals to top quarterbacks after the Cleveland Browns signedDeshaun Watsontoa fully guaranteed, five-year, $230 million contract. Droney ruled that there was insufficient evidence of collusion by the NFL's owners. However, he stated in his decision that the NFLPA had clearly shown that Goodell and Pash had urged owners to keep guarantees lower at the March 2022 league meeting, which occurred just weeks after Watson inked his deal. Shortly after Droney's ruling, the NFL and NFLPA struck a confidentiality agreementto keep the findings secret. As a result, information about Droney's 61-page ruling did not become public until"Pablo Torre Finds Out"reported on it in June. The ruling includedmentions of several quarterbacksand a series of text messages between Arizona Cardinals owner Michael Bidwell and Los Angeles Chargers owner Dean Spanos after Arizona signed quarterbackKyler Murrayto a long-term extension. "Congratulations on signing Murray," Spanos texted Bidwill. "Thanks Deno! These QB deals are expensive but we limited the fully guaranteed money and have some pretty good language," Bidwill wrote back. "Thankfully, we have a QB that's worth paying." "Your deal helps us for our QB next year," Spanos texted. "I think many teams will be happy with it once they have a chance to review. Cleveland really screwed things up, but I was resolved to keep the guaranteed [money] relatively 'low,'" Bidwill responded. None of the quarterbacks mentioned in the evidence – a group that included Murray,Lamar JacksonandRussell Wilson– were made aware of what had happened because of the confidentiality agreement. LLOYD HOWELL:What's next for the NFLPA after stunning resignation? The NFL filed a grievance against the NFLPAin September 2023, which accused the union of encouraging players to fake injuries. The grievance stemmed from comments made by former NFLPA president JC Tretter, which implied faking injuries was a way for players to avoid fines during contract negotiation holdouts. "I think we've seen issues – now, I don't think anybody would say they were fake injuries, but we've seen players who didn't want to be where they currently are, have injuries that made them unable to practice and play, but you're not able to get fined, and you're not able to be punished for not reporting," Tretter said at the time. "So there are issues like that. I don't think I'm allowed to ever recommend that, at least publicly, but I think each player needs to find a way to build up leverage to try to get a fair deal. And that's really what all these guys are looking for, is to be compensated fairly." A non-injury grievance arbitrator ruled in favor of the NFL on Feb. 20, 2025. However, neither the NFL nor the NFLPA publicly disclosed this outcome in the immediate aftermath of the ruling. "The Arbitrator upheld the Management Council's grievance in its entirety and found that Mr. Tretter's statements violated the CBA by improperly encouraging players to fake injury," read a July statement given by the NFL to Pro Football Talk's Mike Florio. The statement also clarified the NFL did not allege any specific player faked an injury. Its main issue was with Tretter's comments being representative of the union condoning or encouraging that behavior, which the league alleged would violate an article in the two parties' collective bargaining agreement. Howell is the former executive director of the NFLPA. He resigned amid scandal after further scrutiny was applied to his two-year tenure in the role. Howell wasn't only responsible for his role in suppressing the two rulings outlined above. It was also revealed he hadexpensed multiple strip club trips on the NFLPA's dimeand hada part-time consulting gig at The Carlyle Group– a private equity firm that the NFL approved to seek minority ownership stakes in its teams – in addition to his job with the NFLPA. "It's clear that my leadership has become a distraction to the important work the NFLPA advances every day. For this reason, I have informed the NFLPA Executive Committee that I am stepping down as Executive Director of the NFLPA and Chairman of the Board of NFL Players effective immediately," Howell said in a statement. "I hope this will allow the NFLPA to maintain its focus on its player members ahead of the upcoming season." OPINION:Former NFLPA head Lloyd Howell was sunk by his own secrets Tretter – an eight-year NFL veteran who played with the Green Bay Packers and Browns before serving as the NFLPA's president from 2020 to 2024 – resigned after scandals rocked the organization. "Over the last couple days, it has gotten very, very hard for my family. And that's something I can't deal with," Tretter toldCBS Sports. "So, the short bullet points are: I have no interest in being [executive director]. I have no interest in being considered; I've let the executive committee know that. I'm also going to leave the NFLPA in the coming days because I don't have anything left to give the organization." Initial reporting indicated Tretter had support as a potential executive director of the NFLPA. Instead, the labor union will have to search elsewhere for a replacement for Howell. It isn't clear who will be the next head of the NFLPA. However, Tretter revealed in his interview with CBS Sports there had been a strong preference among the NFLPA executive committee for David White, the former SAG-AFTRA leader, when Howell was selected. Could the NFLPA executive committee target White after Howell's failed tenure? Only time will tell. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:NFLPA controversies, explained: Why Lloyd Howell, JC Tretter resigned

NFLPA controversies: What to know about Lloyd Howell, JC Tretter resignations

NFLPA controversies: What to know about Lloyd Howell, JC Tretter resignations The NFLPA isn't usually the subject of significant attenti...

 

KOS MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com