President Donald Trump postedon social media Sunday that he wants the Washington Commanders to switch back to their old "Washington Redskins" team name — and he threatened to block theCommanders' impending move back to D.C. and their new stadiumunless they do. A Commanders spokesperson declined comment on the issue to the Washington Post on Sunday. Back in February,team owner Josh Harris committedto sticking with the new name, saying it's "embraced by our team." Apoll conducted in May by the Postsuggested it's embraced by the public too, with 50 percent of local people and 62 percent of Commanders fans saying they either "like" or "love" the name. But Trump appears insistent, so the next logical question is: Can Trump actually block a move? [Get more Commanders news: Washington team feed] As with anything in politics, it's a tangled, complicated answer. We know this: The Commanders have submitted a proposal to move into a new stadium within D.C. limits built on the site of the old Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium, which was the team's home from 1961 to 1996. But there are avenues the president could take, as laid out byFront Office Sports. These are the paths of least resistance, though each would still require Trump to steel himself for a political fight: This would perhaps be the most conventional path to take, though it presents numerous challenges. The District of Columbia is negotiating directly with the Commanders on the $3.7 billion stadium proposal through theD.C. Council,which is the 13-member legislative branch of the District's government. Trump could attempt to get them to vote no through various channels. The main problem: Eleven of the council members are Democrats, including chairman Phil Mendelson, who sounded confused by the president's threat. "I don't know what the restriction would be,"he told the Post. Under theHome Rule Act of 1973,D.C. residents can elect local officials, but the district's budget is subject to Congressional oversight. Right now, the Senate and House of Representatives are controlled by Trump's Republican Party, and would likely approve the blocking of funds for the Commanders' new stadium. From there, untangling the stadium money from government bureaucracy could prove difficult, though there's one potential countermove for the Commanders and D.C. Council, as noted by Front Office Sports: delay public disbursements for the stadium project until after the 2026 midterms, in which Democrats could regain control of the House of Representatives. That would conceivably give the council reinforcements in the battle for stadium money. Former president Joe Bidensigned a bill in Januarythat transferred control of the RFK Stadium site from the federal government to D.C.Section J of the bill,however, outlines grounds for a reversion of control to the federal government and Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum, a Trump appointee. If Burgum wants to exercise it, he would be required to provide written notice to the D.C. Council and give it 90 days to correct the non-compliance. So there appear to be options for Trump to follow through on his threat to prevent the Commanders from building their new stadium. It remains to be seen which one, if any, he'll take.
