Trump, frustrated with some judges, lashes out at former ally and conservative activist Leonard LeoNew Foto - Trump, frustrated with some judges, lashes out at former ally and conservative activist Leonard Leo

NEW YORK (AP) — Conservative legal activist Leonard Leo helped PresidentDonald Trumptransform the federal judiciary in his first term. He closely advised Trump on his Supreme Court picks and is widely credited as the architect of the conservative majority responsible for overturning Roe v. Wade. But Trump last week lashed out at Leo, blaming his former adviser and the group Leo used to head for encouraging him to appoint judges who are now blocking his agenda. Trump called Leo, the former longtime leader of the conservative Federalist Society, a "real 'sleazebag'" and "bad person who, in his own way, probably hates America." Trump's broadsides came aftera three-judge panelat the U.S. Court of International Trade blocked his sweepingtariffs,ruling that he had oversteppedhis authority when he invoked the1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Actto declare a national emergency and levy tariffs on imports from almost every country in the world. While an appeals court soon intervened andallowed the administrationto continue collecting the tariffs while the legal fight plays out, the decision — and Trump's fury at Leo — underscored the extent to which the judiciary is serving as a rare check on Trump's power as he pushes the bounds of executive authority. The judiciary has intervened as he has ordered mass deportations, deep cuts to university funding and the firing of federal workers en masse. Trump's words reflect his broad frustrations with the judiciary, including members of the Supreme Court he appointed on Leo's recommendation, who have allowed some of his more controversial efforts to move forward, but blocked others. Trump's rhetoric also appeared to be a tactic to shift blame for setbacks to his agenda — this time notably pointing the finger at a person who once helped Trump build credibility with conservative voters. But it's unclear what — if anything — Leo had to do with the tariff decision. Leo said that neither he nor the Federalist Society was involved in shaping appointments to the trade court. He offered only praise for Trump. "I'm very grateful for President Trump transforming the Federal Courts, and it was a privilege being involved," he said in a statement. "There's more work to be done, for sure, but the Federal Judiciary is better than it's ever been in modern history, and that will be President Trump's most important legacy." Trump's attacks Trump's fury came via Truth Social after the court tried to halt the central plank of the president's economic agenda:sweeping tariffsthat have rattled global financial markets, dismayed longtime trading partners, and prompted warnings about higher prices and inflation. In response, Trump issued a lengthy and angry missive criticizing the judges behind the decision, accusing them of "destroying America" and saying he hoped the Supreme Court would quickly reverse "this horrible, Country threatening decision." Trump then referred to his first term as president, saying he "was new to Washington, and it was suggested that I use The Federalist Society as a recommending source on Judges. I did so, openly and freely, but then realized that they were under the thumb of a real 'sleazebag' named Leonard Leo, a bad person who, in his own way, probably hates America, and obviously has his own separate ambitions." "I am so disappointed in The Federalist Society because of the bad advice they gave me on numerous Judicial Nominations," he wrote. "This is something that cannot be forgotten!" He added: "Backroom 'hustlers' must not be allowed to destroy our Nation!" Some conservatives, including legal scholars, have been among those pushing back against Trump's trade wars, arguing the Constitution makes clear the power of the purse belongs to Congress, not the president. In April, the New Civil Liberties Alliance, a nonprofit group that Bloomberg Law reported is affiliated with Leo and Charles Koch, filed a separatelawsuit challenging Trump's tariffs on Chinese imports, also accusing him of acting in violation of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. That moveearned the ireof prominent Trump backers like Laura Loomer, who accused both Leo and the Federalist Society of working to undermine the president. The panel Trump assailed included judges appointed by Presidents Barack Obama and Ronald Reagan, as well as Timothy Reif, whom Trump nominated to the trade court during his first term. Reif, a Democrat, had previously worked for the U.S. Trade Representative in both the Obama and Trump administrations. Ina questionnaire submitted to the Senate Judiciary Committeeas part of his confirmation process, Reif described working on a long list of Democratic campaigns. He volunteered on Edward Kennedy's presidential campaign in 1980, driving the press van in Kennedy's motorcade. He served as press secretary for John Lindsay's Senate campaign in 1980 and volunteered for New Jersey Rep. Rush Holt's reelection effort in 2000, when his responsibilities included "driving and accompanying candidate's mother to campaign events." He also volunteered for John Kerry in 2024 and Obama in 2008, anddonated small amounts years ago tothe Clintons and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. Heappears to have participated in one Federalist Society-affiliated event: a panel on international trade in 2011 held by the Georgetown Law Student Chapter. The Federalist Society and Reif did not respond to requests for comment Friday. The White House did not respond to questions about why Trump blamed Leo and the Federalist Society for the decision, but Taylor Rogers, a White House spokesperson, doubled down, calling Leo "a bad person who cares more about his personal ambitions than our country." "These judges must ditch their corrupt allegiance to Leonard and do the right thing for the American people before they completely destroy the credibility of our judicial branch," she said. Who is Leonard Leo? Leo is not a household name, but few people have done more to advance conservative legal causes in the U.S. via a sprawling network of conservative groups. Decades ago, he began to execute a plan to build a pipeline for conservative talent, working to identify, support and promote law school students and lawyers who shared his originalist view of the Constitution, and helping them reach the nation's most powerful courts. Such efforts havereshaped the courts and Republican politics, culminating in Trump's first term with theappointment of three conservative Supreme Court justices. Leo's work also hasprompted protestsoutside his home. The Federalist Society got its start on college campuses when Reagan was president. It was conceived as a way to counter what its members saw as liberal domination of the nation's law-school faculties. During his 2016 campaign, as Trump worked to win over social conservatives wary of electing a thrice-married New York businessman, he promised that the Federalist Society would oversee his judicial nominations, assuring their non-liberal bona fides. "We're going to have great judges, conservative, all picked by the Federalist Society," Trump told Breitbart News radio. And indeed, all three of the Supreme Court Justices Trump went on to nominate had appeared on a list famously compiled by Leo, who took a leave of absence as executive vice president of the society to serve as an outside adviser in the selection process. Leo has since stepped back from the Federalist Society and is now working to extend his reach beyond the courts with theTeneo Network, whichhe has describedas an effort to "crush liberal dominance" and create pipelines of conservative talent "in all sectors of American life," including Hollywood, entertainment, business and finance.

Trump, frustrated with some judges, lashes out at former ally and conservative activist Leonard Leo

Trump, frustrated with some judges, lashes out at former ally and conservative activist Leonard Leo NEW YORK (AP) — Conservative legal activ...
Mike Johnson defends Medicaid requirements in spending bill amid widespread concerns over cutsNew Foto - Mike Johnson defends Medicaid requirements in spending bill amid widespread concerns over cuts

Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., on Sunday defended cuts to Medicaid in the budget bill House Republicanspassed last month,saying that "4.8 million people will not lose their Medicaid unless they choose to do so." Johnson told NBC News' "Meet the Press" that the bill imposes "commonsense" work requirements for some Medicaid recipients and added that he's "not buying" the argument that the work requirements, whichwould requireable-bodied Medicaid recipients to work, participate in job training programs or volunteer for 80 hours a month, are too "cumbersome." "You're telling me that you're going to require the able-bodied, these young men, for example, OK, to only work or volunteer in their community for 20 hours a week. And that's too cumbersome for them?" Johnson told "Meet the Press" moderator Kristen Welker. "I'm not buying it. The American people are not buying it." The bill also adds new rules and paperwork requirements for those Medicaid recipients and increases eligibility checks and address verifications. Johnson argued that the work requirements "should have been put in a long time ago." "The people who are complaining that these people are going to lose their coverage because they can't fulfill the paperwork, this is minor enforcement of this policy, and it follows common sense," Johnson added. Johnson's comments come as Republicans have faced pushback in town halls for the cuts to Medicaid in the "One Big Beautiful Bill" package that passed along party lines in the House last month. Reps.Mike Flood, R-Neb., andAshley Hinson, R-Iowa, were booed when they mentioned their support for the package at events in their districts. Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, also faced pushback after she defended the proposed cuts,tellingattendees at a town hall on Friday that "we all are going to die." The move has also faced criticism from some Senate Republicans. Last month, before the House passed its bill, Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., wrote ina New York Times op-edthat there is a "wing of the party [that] wants Republicans to build our big, beautiful bill around slashing health insurance for the working poor. But that argument is both morally wrong and politically suicidal." In an interview on CBS' "Face the Nation" on Sunday, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., also expressed disdain for the Medicaid provision, calling it "bad strategy" when asked to respond to Hawley's assertion that the legislation would not play well politically for Republicans. "I think it was a bad strategy," Paul said, adding later, "They should have been satisfied by just doing the tax part of this and not getting involved into the debt part of it. Democrats and other opponents of the bill have seized on a number of provisions that include hundreds of billions of dollars in cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and Medicaid, a federal program that provides health care for low-income Americans. Democrats, including Sen. Raphael Warnock, D-Ga., who appeared on the program after Johnson, have argued that Medicaid recipients who get tripped up by the reporting requirements that are set to be imposed alongside the new work requirements will lead to the loss of health care coverage for millions. "This is what this legislation does, that they're trying to do. They're going to throw poor people away," Warnock told Welker. Warnock referenced a study that his office conducted in his home state of Georgia that he said "shows that this work reporting requirement — because that's what we're talking about, not work requirements, work reporting requirement — is very good at kicking people off of their health care." "It's not good at incentivizing work at all," he added. The bill now heads to the Senate, where Johnson said he was confident it would advance and make it to President Donald Trump's desk by July 4. "We're going to get this done. The sooner the better," Johnson said Sunday, adding later: "We're going to get it to the president's desk, and he's going to have a — we're all going to have a glorious celebration on Independence Day, by July 4, when he gets this signed into law."

Mike Johnson defends Medicaid requirements in spending bill amid widespread concerns over cuts

Mike Johnson defends Medicaid requirements in spending bill amid widespread concerns over cuts Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., on Sunday defend...
People know 'they're going to die': Democrat hits GOP senator over viral town hall exchangeNew Foto - People know 'they're going to die': Democrat hits GOP senator over viral town hall exchange

Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Connecticut, hit back at a Republican colleaguewho went viralafter telling a town hall audience member that "we all are going to die" in response to concerns over Medicaid cuts. "I think everybody in that audience knows that they're going to die," Murphy told CNN's Dana Bash. "They would just rather die in old age at 85 or 90, instead of dying at 40." The comment come after Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, addressedfederal cuts to Medicaid– which Republicans have proposed as part of PresidentDonald Trump'ssweeping tax bill – during a town hall in Parkersburg, Iowa, on May 30. As she was speaking, someone shouted from the audience, "people will die!" Ernst then told the auditorium, "People are not – well, we all are going to die. For heaven's sakes, folks." Medicaid, the program that provides health insurance to more than 71 million low-income Americans, would undergobig changesunder the bill that passed in the House last month. That includes new work requirements for some adults beginning in December 2026, more frequent eligibility checks and disincentives for states to cover unauthorized migrant children, among other provisions. Collectively, the Medicaid proposal would save at least $625 billion and cause 7.6 million Americans to lose their health insurance over the next 10 years, according to initial estimates by the nonpartisanCongressional Budget Office. Still, Ernst shared asarcastic apology videoafter facing criticism from Democrats over her response to the town hall attendees' concerns. "Hello everyone," she said in a video posted to social media. "I would like to take this opportunity to sincerely apologize for a statement that I made yesterday at my town hall. "I made an incorrect assumption that everyone in the auditorium understood that yes, we are all going to perish from this Earth," she said. "So, I apologize. And I'm really, really glad that I did not have to bring up the subject of the tooth fairy as well." Republicans have said the proposed changes to Medicaid protect the program for those who need it and that their legislation is curbing waste and fraud. Democrats, like Murphy,argue the falloutwill be felt by Americans across the country. "When rural hospitals close because of this bill, when drug treatment clinics close in Iowa and rural America because of this bill, more people will die at a younger age," Murphy alleged in the interview on June 1. Though Republicans control the Senate, the legislation isn't expected to sail through the upper chamber. Several Senate Republicans, including Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Rand Paul of Kentucky,say the billcomes with too high a price tag. "This is our moment," Johnson told CNN's Jake Tapper in May. "We have witnessed an unprecedented level of increased spending. ... This is our only chance to reset that to a reasonable pre-pandemic level." House SpeakerMike Johnson, R-Louisiana, and other champions of the legislation say the bill is an investment in America's economy. But it's expected to addaround $3.3 trillionto the nation's deficit over the next 10 years and swell the federal government's debt. Contributing: Stephen Gruber-Miller, Des Moines Register;Riley Beggin, USA TODAY This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Dem Chris Muphy hits Republican Joni Ernst town hall Medicaid comment

People know 'they're going to die': Democrat hits GOP senator over viral town hall exchange

People know 'they're going to die': Democrat hits GOP senator over viral town hall exchange Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Connecticut, hi...
Knicks vs. Pacers: Tyrese Haliburton takes swipe at Ben Stiller after Indiana bounces New York from playoffsNew Foto - Knicks vs. Pacers: Tyrese Haliburton takes swipe at Ben Stiller after Indiana bounces New York from playoffs

Tyrese Haliburtongot the win and the last word. Check back in 25 or 30 years to see if the barbs Haliburton and actor/director Ben Stiller exchanged during the Eastern Conference finals will have the enduring memory of the feud between Reggie Miller and Spike Lee. But in the culture of 2025, theIndiana Pacersstar scored a strong final zinger against theNew York Knickssuperfan. Prior to Saturday's Game 6 matchup, a clip of Haliburton arriving at the Pacers' home arena of Gainbridge Fieldhouse circulated online. The two-time All-Star cut an imposing figure walking down a corridor dressed all in black, referencingthe Knicks doing the samebefore last year's Game 6 playoff matchup. But in response to the video, Stiller focused on the duffel bag Haliburton was carrying. Good thing he brought his duffel for the flight to NY.https://t.co/0vHKAEPHhI — Ben Stiller (@BenStiller)May 31, 2025 "Good thing he brought his duffel for the flight to NY,"Stiller quipped. It was a good line from Stiller, implying the Knicks would win Game 6 and send the series back to Madison Square Garden for a decisive Game 7. But it rang hollow approximately six hours later when the Pacers won,125-108, and eliminated New York from the NBA playoffs. After scoring 21 points with 13 assists, Haliburton responded while celebrating Indiana's victory. "Nah, was to pack y'all up,"he replied, following up an on-court win with a social-media win. Nah, was to pack y'all uphttps://t.co/hhgo9fp8ib — Tyrese Haliburton (@TyHaliburton22)June 1, 2025 Stiller showed he was a good sport and no hard feelings lingered, wishing Haiburton and the Pacers well in their NBA Finals matchup with theOklahoma City Thunder. "Congrats,"he said. "All the best in OKC." Congrats. All the best in OKC. — Ben Stiller (@BenStiller)June 1, 2025 So will Haliburton start trading digs withany celebrity Thunder fansduring the NBA Finals? Maybe with legendary WWE broadcasterJim Ross? Is "Saturday Night Live" alum and "Barry" star Bill Hader on social media? Would sniping back and forth with actor James Marsden bring the same juice? Perhaps an opponent will rise once the NBA Finals begin on Thursday.

Knicks vs. Pacers: Tyrese Haliburton takes swipe at Ben Stiller after Indiana bounces New York from playoffs

Knicks vs. Pacers: Tyrese Haliburton takes swipe at Ben Stiller after Indiana bounces New York from playoffs Tyrese Haliburtongot the win an...
Iga Swiatek survives early blitz, advances at French OpenNew Foto - Iga Swiatek survives early blitz, advances at French Open

Four-time champion Iga Swiatek survived a scare by rallying to a 1-6, 6-3, 7-5 win over 12th-seeded Elena Rybakina on Sunday to advance to the quarterfinals of the French Open in Paris. The win was the 25th in a row at Roland Garros for the Poland native, tying Monica Seles for the second-longest Parisian winning streak in the Open Era. It was far from easy for Swiatek, who totaled 27 unforced errors over the first eight games of the match -- losing six of them. "The first set, I felt like I was playing against Jannik Sinner," Swiatek said, the defending champion, said. "I just kept fighting." Swiatek rebounded, however, and dispatched Rybakina, of Kazakhstan, in two hours, 30 minutes to set up a quarterfinal match against 13th-seeded Elina Svitolina. The Ukrainian saved three match points and recorded a 4-6, 7-6 (6), 6-1 win over fourth-seeded Jasmine Paolini of Italy in two hours, 24 minutes. Svitolina dropped the first set and fell behind 5-3 in the second before turning it around. She won seven of the next eight games to change the momentum and ultimately advance to her 13th Grand Slam quarterfinal. "It was, I think, 5-4 or 5-3 at that time when I was two match points down. Of course, it was not usual maybe for her, but also, it's such a pressure moment that sometimes can happen for both of us," Svitolina said of Paolini. "Yeah, I'm very happy I could save another match point on the tiebreak, because tiebreak was very close, and a few points just decided the whole second set." In another match on Sunday, eighth-seeded Qinwen Zheng of China advanced to the French Open quarterfinals for the first time following a 7-6 (5), 1-6, 6-3 win over Liudmila Samsonova of Russia. Zheng joined 2011 French Open champion Li Na as the lone Chinese players in the Open Era to reach the women's quarterfinals by turning back Samsonova in two hours, 47 minutes. Zheng relied on her serve, with five of her 10 aces coming in the third set. She will face top-seeded Aryna Sabalenka of Belarus in the quarterfinals. Sabalenka defeated 16th-seeded Amanda Anisimova 7-5, 6-3 and has not dropped a set in this tournament. Sabalenka hit 29 winners on the day, including 11 aces. Anisimova didn't go down easily, however. Down 5-2 and serving to stay in the match, Anisimova fought off six break points to hold serve. She faced two more match points, saving one, as Sabalenka served for the win. --Field Level Media

Iga Swiatek survives early blitz, advances at French Open

Iga Swiatek survives early blitz, advances at French Open Four-time champion Iga Swiatek survived a scare by rallying to a 1-6, 6-3, 7-5 win...

 

KOS MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com